Ruby Fundamentally Flawed?
This is interesting because it’s the first time I’ve actually seen somebody criticize Ruby instead of praising it.
This is a single archived entry from Stefan Tilkov’s blog. For more up-to-date content, check out my author page at INNOQ, which has more information about me and also contains a list of published talks, podcasts, and articles. Or you can check out the full archive.
This is interesting because it’s the first time I’ve actually seen somebody criticize Ruby instead of praising it.
In fact, it was that lack of honest criticism that finally goaded me to put my thoughts into words.
It looks like I’m not alone any more. Bruce Eckel has just posted an article “Thinking in Ruby … not” (http://onthethought.blogspot.com/2005/01/thinking-in-ruby-not.html) from which I gather he feels the same way that I do: that Ruby’s an improvement over Perl, but not enough of an improvement.
Thanks for pointing this out. I don’t know why, but somehow the link is broken: http://onthethought.blogspot.com/2005/01/thinking-in-ruby-not.html In any case, I found your critique to be more informed (Bruce simply seems not to know the language at all.)